Many times I've watched CEOs or CFOs and CIOs or CTOs talk about whether their data centers should be more like Google's or not. Almost invariably, the CEO or CFO says something along the lines of: "Whenever we talk about data centers, it's so complicated," or "Why can't our environment be more like Google's, which seems to have a huge pool of resources?" Almost invariably, the CIO or CTO will respond that Google isn't a good comparison because it just runs one big application, ie search.
I tend to think this discussion tends to miss two key points--data center scale and application age:
Is this downturn – with its global scope finally going to be the tipping point for mass adoption of video conferencing as a business tool. The cost for the units has fallen dramatically, as has the cost of the backbone network (although it remains significant). And voice quality is better than you get over the phone line.
At McKinsey we are a bit of test bed for my assertion. Over the last 18 months to the end of 2008 we have installed close to 500 HD desktop units, a dozen or so immersion rooms and a host of more basic room-level solutions.
