In many organizations the annual planning cycle is well underway. Some CIOs and CTOs enjoy a privileged position and are at the heart of shaping the future of their organization through this process. Others are at the receiving end of this process and work under constraints that make it hard to deliver technology-enabled value creation for the enterprise. The difference sometimes comes down to personal characteristics: charismatic leaders, strong communicators and proven relationship builders often achieve greater impact. But there is also an institutional aspect. A good understanding of the role and value of technology among all executives in the organization makes it much easier to deliver impact. How can this be improved?
A recent study of global CIOs by IBM shows that what keeps CIOs up at night isn't necessarily just short term IT cost pressure. The study indicates that intelligence & analytics (cited by 83% of respondents) and virtualization (cited by 76% of respondents) are top of mind.
This makes sense and suggests that CIOs are thinking ahead in terms of how IT can help position their companies for success in the new normal.
I’ve long believed many large and mid-size organizations are missing an opportunity by not “engaging” in IT architecture. I confirmed it again the other day during an informal discussion with David C. Robertson, professor at IMD in Lausanne, Switzerland, and one of the authors of the book “Enterprise Architecture as Strategy”.
For the second year running we have surveyed European telecoms on their IT use. Our benchmark study looks at IT spending as a share of revenues and also probes the IT effectiveness of telecom operators. While the IT spend on revenues is easy to measure, IT effectiveness is more complicated. We have developed a score that takes into account three key dimensions: time-to-market for new products and new tariffs, IT service availability and functional coverage per key IT domain (e.g., sales & marketing, provisioning).
Preliminary findings show that fixed line operators have improved their cost position by about 1 percentage point, which is a a significant improvement, while their effectiveness score rose by about 10 percent. Mobile operators have not improved their cost position but have improved their IT effectiveness by about 6 percent.
